So, now we’re trying to ban Roald Dahl?!

What on earth possesses some people to take offence at the most trivial, ridiculous things is quite beyond me.

But the King of Kids, Mr Roald Dahl, is continuing to cause offence among bored housewives across Australia.

9780857550569

 

All because of this rather innocuous book of twisted fairy tales. 

Aldi, a major supermarket brand in Australia, has withdrawn this book from stock after receiving complaints about swear words in this book. The glorious offended are even threatening to boycott Aldi over this terrible, awful word. 

The word in question is SLUT. 

Prince Charming uses this insult against Cinderella:

“Who is this dirty slut? Off with her nut!”

tumblr_lzloj70PSu1qbrqth

Slut, in this instance, is not used as a comment on Cinderella’s sexual promiscuity, real or imagined. It’s a comment on the general filth of the girl in rags. If people can’t use a dictionary, it is not my problem, Dahl’s problem or Aldi’s problem. 

Slut (noun)

1. a woman who has many casual sexual partners

2. a woman with low standards of cleanliness

Fine, if you don’t want to use that word at all, that’s your decision. But denying other people the right to read this book to their children is a bit rich. Why not simply replace the word if you don’t like it?! There’s several that work!

I don’t think the wording should be changed in the book itself either. No, I refuse to see another Faraway Tree happening. In that case, the characters names were changed from “Fanny and Dick” to “Franny and Rick” or some garbage. I don’t know about you, but when I was 6 years old, it never occurred to me to have a giggle at their names- they were just their names! 

Heaven forbid your name is actually Fanny or Dick, coz if the PC police catch you, you’d better be ready to be censored. You’re a danger to society, just like these gosh darned kids books!

Thankfully, in the case of Revolting Rhymes, the general consensus is that people need to get over it. The book has been out since the 80’s and no child has become a raging homicial maniac because of it yet. 

 resized_creepy-willy-wonka-meme-generator-but-did-you-die-8aace2 

I think it comes down to reading the books you give to children yourself before handing them over. It’s simple parental supervision. 

This week I went to buy the boy I tutor a graphic novel I had heard great things about. A quick flick through that book told me I really didn’t want to be the one to give it to a 16 year old. So instead of jumping up and down screaming “BUT WON’T ANYONE THINK OF THE CHILDREN?!?!” I put it down and GOT ANOTHER BOOK. Easy. Crisis averted. 

It’s really that easy, people. Don’t like it? Don’t buy it. 

Simples!

 

For more news on how the inimitable Roald Dahl has managed to piss everyone off recently, jump over to The Resurgent Bookworm!

Advertisements

5 thoughts on “So, now we’re trying to ban Roald Dahl?!

  1. Censoring names and banning childrens books is sad. I think the main problem with adults is that they don’t understand basic child psychology – the more you ban it and create a hue and cry, the more they are going to want to read it. A lot of my classmates in school did the same with sweet valley university, etc.
    I was also surprised to recently find out that To Kill a Mockingbird is one of the books with most requests for bans – thats just unfortunate.

    • Really? To Kill a Mockingbird?! That’s disgusting… I can’t even think what would upset people about that book!

      I agree- the more people said a book was too old or too inappropriate, the more I wanted to read it.
      That’s how books like “Puberty Blues” and “Are You There God? It’s Me, Margaret” got passed around under the desks!
      And now, kids are going to hear that the book involves “dirty words”, they’ll pay attention to it rather than skipping over it like they did in the past. It’s sad, really.

  2. Oh gosh, this is ridiculous! In a world where free speech dominates, I really don’t see why books have to be censored or banned altogether. If it offends someone, they don’t have to read it, do they? It’s awful that they take the enjoyment away from others though, especially with something like Dahl!

    • I don’t either- the thought is absolutely ridiculous to me. I don’t particularly like gory movies and think some of them are just beyond revolting, but I won’t stop someone else watching them!
      Dahl is such an outstanding children’s author, I think it’s even worse that its him they’re targeting. Particularly when the person who made the initial complaint didn’t even spell her outrage properly =P

Tell me what you think!

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s